TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether repudiation of the life insurance policy was justified under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, 1938 on the ground that the insured had made false answers and suppressed a material fact regarding a prior operation.
Analysis: The insured had undergone a major operation and answered negatively to questions about prior operations, absence from work on health grounds, and the state of health. The false answers were undisputed. Under Section 45, a policy can be questioned within two years if the statement was on a material matter or suppressed facts material to disclose, was fraudulently made, and was known by the policy-holder to be false or suppressive. The governing principle in life insurance is utmost good faith, and both non-disclosure and misrepresentation defeat the contract when they relate to material information. The Court held that the omission to disclose the operation was material, deliberate, and sufficient to justify repudiation, and that the social security character of life insurance does not protect fraudulent concealment.
Conclusion: Repudiation of the policy was valid, and the challenge to it failed.
Ratio Decidendi: In a life insurance contract, deliberate suppression or false answers concerning a material fact justify repudiation within the statutory period, because the contract is one of utmost good faith and material non-disclosure vitiates the policy.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
