Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the penalty imposed for failure to fulfill export obligation and misuse of goods imported under advance licence called for interference and reduction.
Analysis: The authorities had found, on detailed examination of the record, that the licence conditions were breached and that the imported goods were not utilized in accordance with the licence. The liability to penalty arose under Section 4-I(1) of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 read with Section 20(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992. Although the breach was upheld, the Court considered the quantum of penalty in light of the value of the goods and the statutory range of punishment.
Conclusion: The penalty was upheld in principle, but the amount was reduced from Rs. 45 lakhs to Rs. 20 lakhs.