Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in deducting one-third from the comparable sale price while determining compensation for acquired land that was already developed and suitable for building purposes.
Analysis: In determining market value under land acquisition law, comparable sales of smaller plots may be relevant, but deductions for development are warranted only where the acquired land requires further development to be made fit for building use. The deduction principle is not absolute. Where the acquired land is already level, has road access and civic amenities in the vicinity, lies in a developed area, and can be used as building sites without further development, prices fetched by small developed plots may be adopted without such deduction. On the evidence, the lands acquired were adjacent to developed areas, had surrounding infrastructure, and were suitable for immediate use as house sites. The same position applied to the land acquired for the road alignment.
Conclusion: The High Court was not justified in applying a deduction for development and reducing the compensation; the market value fixed by the Subordinate Judge was restored in favour of the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: Deduction from comparable-sale value for development is unnecessary where the acquired land is already developed or ripe for immediate building use and does not require material development works.