Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate authority should be directed to dispose of the stay petition expeditiously and whether recovery proceedings should remain in abeyance until such disposal.
Analysis: The writ petition arose from an assessment demand under the Income-tax Act and the pendency of an appeal accompanied by a stay petition before the appellate authority. In view of the pending stay petition, the Court directed the appellate authority to consider and pass orders on the stay petition within one month from receipt of a certified copy of the judgment. The Court also directed that coercive recovery proceedings for the balance demand be kept in abeyance until orders were passed on the stay petition.
Outcome: Directions issued to the appellate authority to decide the stay petition within one month and recovery proceedings were stayed in the meantime.