Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the remuneration of the foreign technicians was exempt from Indian tax under article 15 of the double taxation avoidance agreement between India and Czechoslovakia.
Analysis: Article 15 applied to salaries, wages and similar remuneration derived by a resident of one contracting state in respect of employment exercised in the other state. The technicians were treated as non-residents and were present in India for less than 183 days. The payments shown by BHEL were in substance remittances to the foreign employer, Skoda Export, and there was no permanent establishment of that employer in India. On those facts, the conditions in article 15(2) were satisfied and the remuneration, if any, could not be taxed in India. The challenge to tax paid on behalf of the technicians did not survive once exemption under the treaty was accepted.
Conclusion: The remuneration of the foreign technicians was not taxable in India under the treaty, and the assessments could not stand.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a non-resident employee is present in India for less than 183 days and the remuneration is paid by or on behalf of a non-resident employer without being borne by a permanent establishment in India, article 15 of the treaty bars Indian taxation of that remuneration.