Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a sale of the defaulter's property by a civil court in execution proceedings, made while reassessment proceedings under the KGST Act were pending, was void as against the State's sales tax claim under Section 26A, and whether the purchasers acquired title free from the tax liability.
Analysis: Section 26A invalidates any transfer or parting with possession by an assessee during the pendency of proceedings under the Act as against tax claims. The provision was treated as having a wide reach, and the Court held that there is no material distinction, for this purpose, between a transfer by the defaulter and a sale through court execution, because otherwise the statutory protection could be defeated through a civil decree and execution sale. The Court also noted that the property had earlier been subject to recovery steps for sales tax arrears and that the reassessment proceedings were pending when the execution sale took place.
Conclusion: The execution sale was covered by Section 26A and was void as against the tax claim. The subsequent sale in favour of the petitioners was also void, and the impugned orders were upheld.
Final Conclusion: The petitioners could not claim a title free from the defaulter's sales tax liability, and the State was entitled to proceed against the property for recovery of arrears.
Ratio Decidendi: A transfer of the defaulter's property made during the pendency of proceedings under the sales tax law, including a court sale in execution, is void against the tax claim and does not defeat the State's right to recover arrears as a first charge.