Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a vanaspati manufacturing concern carrying on manufacture and sale of vegetable oil and refined oil is an "oil mill" within item 5 of Part I of the Schedule to the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, and whether the appellants were therefore liable for contraventions of the Act and the Gujarat Minimum Wages Rules, 1961.
Analysis: The expression "oil mill" was construed in the context of the Schedule by reference to the ordinary meaning of "oil". Vanaspati, though subjected to processes such as neutralisation, bleaching, deodorisation, hardening and hydrogenation, was held to retain its essential character as oil. The Court also accepted the unchallenged factual finding that oil and refined oil were sold in the regular course of business, so that a substantial part of the undertaking was connected with oil-mill activity. Once the concern fell within the scheduled employment, the objections based on the composition of the wage-fixation committee and the alleged non-application of sections 5 and 9 failed.
Conclusion: The concern was an oil mill within item 5 of Part I of the Schedule, the Act applied to it, and the convictions and sentences under section 22A were sustained.