Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether precipitated silica manufactured from silica sand and sodium silicate was a mineral silica covered by Notification No. 23/55 dated 29-4-1955 and therefore entitled to exemption from duty.
Analysis: The notification exempted minerals employed as extenders, suspending agents, fillers or diluents and specifically named silica. The product, though obtained through chemical and physical processing, remained silica in substance and was recognised in technical literature as a mineral filler. The notification did not require the article to be confined to naturally occurring silica or to be classified under a particular tariff item. The absence of an express mention of precipitated silica did not exclude it where the substance fell within the description of silica as a mineral used as a filler or extender.
Conclusion: Precipitated silica was held to be covered by Notification No. 23/55 and the assessee was entitled to the exemption.