Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether service tax paid on Security Agency Service used for an off-factory guest house and residential colony could be treated as input service for Cenvat credit, and whether the matter required remand for verification of inclusion of such expenditure in the cost of production.
Analysis: The unamended definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was applicable to the relevant period, and its inclusive part covered activities relating to business. Services used for maintaining staff residential colonies had been treated as eligible input services in prior decisions. At the same time, the respondent's assertion that the expenditure on the disputed service formed part of the cost of production was not supported by documentary evidence before the lower authorities.
Conclusion: The service could merit Cenvat credit if the disputed expenditure formed part of the cost of production, but the absence of supporting records required remand for de novo verification. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Where expenditure on a service used in relation to business forms part of the cost of production, the service may qualify as input service for Cenvat credit, subject to verification of supporting records.