Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land excluded from the definition of capital asset, and whether the gains arising from its sale were liable to be assessed as capital gains under section 12B of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The land was situated on a busy municipal road, comprised only a small extent, contained a building yielding rent, and carried only a few trees, with no reliable material to show that the income from those trees was agricultural income. The nature of the land was therefore treated as a question of fact, and on the facts found it could not be regarded as agricultural land. Once the land did not fall within the exclusion in the definition of capital asset, section 12B applied to the profits arising from its sale. The availability of the statutory appellate and reference remedies also showed that writ jurisdiction was not the proper course.
Conclusion: The land was not agricultural land, it was a capital asset, and the sale proceeds were assessable as capital gains under section 12B. The writ petition failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Land on which agricultural character is not established on the facts, especially where it is urban in character and bears a building or non-agricultural indicia, is not excluded from the definition of capital asset and its sale profits are taxable as capital gains.