Agricultural land characterization and transfer timing in capital gains were decided on possession, use, and credible evidence.

Land sold was held not to be agricultural land where certificates were unsupported by contemporaneous revenue records and the surrounding evidence showed non-agricultural and commercial use, including nearby development and construction activity; the land was therefore treated as a capital asset chargeable to capital gains tax. Transfer of 222.93 cents was found to have taken place in January 2006 when possession was handed over under an agreement for sale and the buyer began construction, so the gain was assessable only in assessment year 2006-07 and not 2008-09. The sale consideration for 18.98 cents and 32.19 cents was restored for fresh enquiry, while the valuation rate of Rs.100 per cent as on 1.4.1981 was sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the lands sold by the assessees were agricultural lands or capital assets liable to capital gains tax; (ii) in which assessment year the capital gain on transfer of 222.93 cents was chargeable; (iii) whether the enhancement of sale consideration in respect of 18.98 cents and 32.19 cents required fresh examination.

Issue (i): whether the lands sold by the assessees were agricultural lands or capital assets liable to capital gains tax.

Analysis: The certificates relied on by the assessees were found unreliable because they were based on the assessees' own assertions and not on contemporaneous revenue records. The record showed no credible proof of regular agricultural operations, no supporting evidence of agricultural income or expenditure, and positive material indicating non-agricultural and commercial user of the land, including its location near the bus stand, prior use for other activities, and the construction of a shopping complex on the property.

Conclusion: The lands were not agricultural lands and constituted capital assets chargeable to capital gains tax.

Issue (ii): in which assessment year the capital gain on transfer of 222.93 cents was chargeable.

Analysis: The possession of the property was handed over in January 2006 under an agreement of sale, part consideration had been received, and the buyer had started construction. On these facts, the transfer fell within the deeming provisions governing transfer through part performance and transfer enabling enjoyment of immovable property.

Conclusion: The capital gain on 222.93 cents was assessable only in assessment year 2006-07, and the assessment made in assessment year 2008-09 was deleted.

Issue (iii): whether the enhancement of sale consideration in respect of 18.98 cents and 32.19 cents required fresh examination.

Analysis: For 18.98 cents, the finding that transfer occurred on the registration date was sustained, but the adoption of the higher sale rate was made without proper enquiry from the purchaser. For 32.19 cents, the comparable basis used by the revenue had lost force after the connected finding on the adjacent parcel, and the actual consideration also required verification from the buyers. The issue of market value as on 1.4.1981 was not displaced by any contrary material from the assessees.

Conclusion: The assessment of transfer date for 18.98 cents was upheld, but the sale consideration for 18.98 cents and 32.19 cents was set aside for fresh enquiry by the Assessing Officer; the rate of Rs.100 per cent as on 1.4.1981 was sustained.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only to the extent of deleting the capital gain assessed for 222.93 cents in assessment year 2008-09, while the remaining valuation issues were partly upheld and partly restored for fresh consideration.

Ratio Decidendi: For capital gains purposes, the true character of land must be determined from the cumulative surrounding circumstances and credible evidence of actual agricultural use, and transfer is complete when possession is given in part performance with the buyer obtaining effective control of the immovable property.

---