Minor stock variation, waste clearance and disclosed scrap sales defeated extended limitation and penalty in central excise

Minor stock variations in molasses and sugar, explained by the manufacturing process and regular excise monitoring, did not justify duty demand, so the demand was set aside. Bagasse and press mud were treated as manufacturing waste, not excisable goods, and no duty or Cenvat credit reversal was payable on their clearance. Scrap sales were disclosed in books, balance sheets, invoices and tax returns, so suppression was not established and the extended period could not be invoked. Duty on tin scrap was deleted, normal-period duty on MS scrap was sustained, and the penalty was set aside.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the duty demand based on alleged excess molasses and shortage of sugar was sustainable; (ii) whether bagasse and press mud attracted reversal of credit or duty on clearance; (iii) whether duty and penalty on sale of scrap, including tin scrap, were sustainable and whether the extended period could be invoked.

Issue (i): Whether the duty demand based on alleged excess molasses and shortage of sugar was sustainable.

Analysis: The stock of molasses was under regular monitoring by the State Excise authorities and the records showed periodic inspection and corresponding entries. The discrepancy in molasses was minor and was explained by the ongoing manufacturing process and the presence of foam, which could affect physical stock-taking. The shortage in sugar was also marginal, being less than half per cent of the total stock, and was consistent with a normal variation during production.

Conclusion: The duty confirmed on molasses and sugar was not sustainable and was set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether bagasse and press mud attracted reversal of credit or duty on clearance.

Analysis: Bagasse and press mud were waste generated in the course of manufacture and did not constitute excisable goods for the purpose of Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Their clearance did not require reversal of credit or payment of duty.

Conclusion: No duty or credit reversal was payable on bagasse and press mud.

Issue (iii): Whether duty and penalty on sale of scrap, including tin scrap, were sustainable and whether the extended period could be invoked.

Analysis: The scrap sales were recorded in the books of account, reflected in the balance sheets, supported by invoices, and subjected to sales tax, showing absence of suppression. On that basis, the extended period of limitation was not available to the department. Duty was still confirmable for the normal period on MS scrap, but the tin scrap arose from dismantling of hutments and the duty demand on that item was not justified. In view of the mixed outcome and the absence of suppression, the penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not survive.

Conclusion: The extended period was not invokable, duty on tin scrap was deleted, normal-period duty on MS scrap was sustained, and the penalty was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was modified substantially in favour of the assessee, with duty on sugar, molasses, bagasse, press mud, and tin scrap deleted, normal-period duty on MS scrap sustained, and penalty removed.

Ratio Decidendi: Minor stock variations during an ongoing manufacturing process, clearance of waste such as bagasse and press mud, and disclosed scrap sales supported by records and returns do not justify adverse inferences, invocation of the extended period, or penalty in the absence of suppression.

---