Genuineness of purchaser firms required fresh scrutiny before deciding bona fide conduct and suppression-based demand.

The Tribunal's order was set aside and the matter remitted for de novo consideration because the foundational facts on the genuineness of the alleged purchaser firms had not been properly examined. The Court held that the assessee's plea of bona fide conduct based on SSI registration certificates, and the role of the commission agent, required fuller scrutiny before any final determination on alleged violation of import exemption conditions and suppression-based demand. The adjudicating authority was directed to re-examine the assessee's burden to establish the status and addresses of the entities, together with the payment trail for the goods sold through the commission agent.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order required interference and remand for fresh consideration on the questions whether the alleged purchaser firms were genuine and whether the assessee acted bona fide on the basis of the SSI registration certificates, in the context of alleged violation of the import exemption conditions and suppression-based demand.

Analysis: The record showed that the genuineness and status of three purchasing entities remained doubtful and that these foundational facts had not been properly examined. The assessee's plea of bona fide conduct based on SSI registration certificates and the role of the commission agent also needed fuller scrutiny. The matter was therefore not fit for final adjudication on the existing record, and the adjudicating authority was directed to examine the dispute afresh, including the assessee's burden to establish the status and addresses of the entities and the payment trail for the goods sold through the commission agent.

Conclusion: The Tribunal's order was set aside and the matter was remitted for de novo consideration in accordance with law, with the Department succeeding in the appeal.

---