Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the amount already reversed by the assessee was sufficient to justify waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay of recovery.
Analysis: The dispute concerned credit taken on common input services used in relation to both dutiable and exempted goods. The Tribunal noted that Rule 6 stood retrospectively amended and that, under the amended position, proportionate reversal of credit attributable to exempted goods was the relevant consideration. On the facts, the amount already deposited was treated as adequate for the purpose of hearing the appeals.
Conclusion: The remaining pre-deposit was waived and recovery of the balance demand was stayed.