Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when no personal hearing was granted before its passing under section 22(4) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: Section 22(4) requires the authority to afford personal hearing before finalising the assessment where the assessee's contentions are to be considered. The impugned order was passed without granting such hearing, despite objections having been filed. Denial of the hearing amounted to a breach of the principles of natural justice and deprived the assessee of an opportunity to substantiate its claim.
Conclusion: The assessment order was set aside for violation of the requirement of personal hearing, and the matter was sent back to the authority to hear the assessee and pass a fresh order on merits in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded to the extent of setting aside the impugned order and remitting the matter for reconsideration after hearing the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute mandates personal hearing before final assessment, an order passed without such hearing is vitiated by breach of natural justice and cannot be sustained.