Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1995 (10) TMI 17 - HC - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal upheld despite penalty reduction under section 18(2A) The court confirmed that the appeal from the Wealth-tax Officer's penalty order was permissible despite the Commissioner's reduction of the penalty under ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal upheld despite penalty reduction under section 18(2A)

                            The court confirmed that the appeal from the Wealth-tax Officer's penalty order was permissible despite the Commissioner's reduction of the penalty under section 18(2A). The Tribunal's decision to uphold the cancellation of the penalty by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was also upheld. No costs were awarded.




                            Issues Involved
                            1. Appealability of the Wealth-tax Officer's order levying penalty under section 18(1)(a) in light of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax's order under section 18(2A).
                            2. Confirmation of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order by the Tribunal.
                            3. Competency of the appeal against the Wealth-tax Officer's penalty order in view of section 18(2B).
                            4. Legality of the Tribunal's confirmation of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order canceling the penalty.

                            Detailed Analysis

                            Issue 1: Appealability of the Wealth-tax Officer's Order
                            The primary question was whether the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in holding that the Wealth-tax Officer's order levying penalty under section 18(1)(a) was not passed in pursuance of the Commissioner of Wealth-tax's order under section 18(2A), thereby allowing the assessee the right to appeal without the bar of section 18(2B). The court clarified that the scope and jurisdiction of sections 18(1)(a) and 18(2A) are different. Section 18(1)(a) deals with the imposition of penalty for failure to file returns without reasonable cause, whereas section 18(2A) allows the Commissioner to reduce or waive the penalty based on certain conditions. The court emphasized that the Commissioner's order under section 18(2A) does not negate the assessee's right to appeal against the Wealth-tax Officer's penalty order.

                            Issue 2: Confirmation of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Order
                            The Tribunal upheld the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order, which had canceled the penalty imposed by the Wealth-tax Officer. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner found that the penalty proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, and the Revenue failed to establish that the assessee's failure to file the return was without reasonable cause. Thus, the penalty was deleted. The Tribunal agreed with this reasoning, emphasizing that the necessary ingredient for penalty under section 18(1)(a) is "failure to file the return without reasonable cause."

                            Issue 3: Competency of the Appeal
                            The court examined whether the appeal against the Wealth-tax Officer's penalty order was competent in view of section 18(2B). Section 18(2B) states that the order under section 18(2A) is final and not subject to appeal. However, the court distinguished between the two provisions, noting that section 18(2A) deals with the reduction or waiver of penalty, while section 18(1)(a) addresses the imposition of penalty. The court held that the right to appeal against the imposition of penalty under section 18(1)(a) remains intact, even if the Commissioner has exercised discretion under section 18(2A).

                            Issue 4: Legality of the Tribunal's Confirmation
                            The Tribunal confirmed the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order canceling the penalty. The court supported this decision, stating that the Wealth-tax Officer's order retained its independent character and was not merely an executive action giving effect to the Commissioner's order. The Wealth-tax Officer had independently laid the foundation for imposing the penalty by rejecting the assessee's explanation for the delay in filing the return and then applied the Commissioner's order to reduce the penalty. Thus, the appeal against the Wealth-tax Officer's order was maintainable.

                            Conclusion
                            The court answered all the questions in the affirmative, confirming that the Appellate Commissioner could entertain the appeal from the Wealth-tax Officer's order imposing penalty, despite the reduction of the penalty amount by the Commissioner under section 18(2A). The Tribunal's decision to uphold the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's order canceling the penalty was also affirmed. There was no order as to costs.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found