Block assessment additions require seized material linked to undisclosed income, not mere presumption or estimate.

In block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, additions must be supported by material found during search or by information directly relatable to that search; mere conjecture, estimate, or a statement that does not specifically link the assessee to undisclosed income is insufficient. Where the seized material did not show bogus sales or higher sale realisation, the sales were recorded in the regular books, and receipts were by cheque, the Tribunal was right to delete the addition and the block assessment could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether an addition in block assessment could be sustained in the absence of material found during search showing undisclosed income of the assessee and whether the Tribunal was right in deleting the addition for suppressed sales.

Analysis: The addition was founded on a search in another group and on a statement recorded during search, but no document or material specifically linked the assessee to bogus sales or higher sale realisation. The statement did not name the assessee, the sale proceeds were recorded in the regular books, and the receipts were through cheques. In a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, additions must rest on material discovered during search or information relatable to such search. An estimate or presumption, without seized material showing undisclosed income, is insufficient to replace regular assessment with block assessment.

Conclusion: The Tribunal correctly deleted the addition and held that the block assessment was unsustainable. The appeal was rightly rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: Additions in block assessment can be made only on the basis of material found in search or material/information relatable to the search, and not on mere conjecture or estimate when no undisclosed income is shown by the seized material.

---