Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on glass bottles used for packing aerated water was admissible on the footing that the cost of the bottles was included in the assessable value of the final product.
Analysis: The record showed that the assessee had submitted a cost statement and declaration to the excise authorities stating that the value of the glass bottles was included in the assessable value of aerated water, and the adjudicating authority accepted that material. The appellate authority upset that finding without a sufficient basis, even though the issue had to be decided on the evidence produced and the factual satisfaction recorded by the original authority. In appellate jurisdiction, a reasonable view based on relevant material could not be disturbed merely because another view was possible.
Conclusion: The finding denying credit was unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit.