Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by the assessee-bank to its depositors in Porbandar was interest chargeable under the Indian Income-tax Act so as to attract the proviso to Section 10(2)(iii) and deny the deduction claimed.
Analysis: The deduction under Section 10(2)(iii) was questioned on the footing that the depositors' interest was taxable because the bank used the borrowed funds in British India. The governing principle, as applied, was that liability to tax on such interest depended on a nexus between the lender and the use of the borrowed money in British India, and that the lender's knowledge that the money would be taken into British India and used to earn income had to form part of the integral transaction. On the facts, the depositors were concerned only with earning interest on their deposits and had no knowledge or concern as to how the bank would employ the funds. In the absence of such knowledge, the interest paid to the depositors was not chargeable to tax, and the bank was not bound to deduct tax under Section 18(3A).
Conclusion: The bank was entitled to the deduction under Section 10(2)(iii) in respect of the interest paid to its depositors.