Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disciplinary inquiry was vitiated because prior statements of witnesses recorded in the preliminary inquiry were admitted at the regular inquiry without recording their evidence afresh in the presence of the delinquent officer, and whether clause 8 of section 545 of the Bombay Police Manual contravened the rules of natural justice.
Analysis: Tribunals exercising quasi-judicial powers are not bound by the technical procedure of courts or by strict rules of evidence, but they must act fairly and give the person affected a fair opportunity to meet the material used against him. That requirement is satisfied when prior statements are put to the witness, the witness is recalled and tendered for cross-examination, copies of the statements are furnished, and the delinquent is enabled to explain or challenge them. The insistence that the earlier statements must be repeated word for word in the presence of the delinquent was treated as a matter of form rather than substance. On that basis, the procedure adopted at the inquiry was held to be consistent with natural justice, and the manual provision was not found to be invalid.
Conclusion: The disciplinary inquiry was not vitiated on the ground of breach of natural justice, and clause 8 of section 545 of the Bombay Police Manual was upheld.