Tribunal remits Section 14A appeal for quantification. Rule 8D inapplicable per court decision. Fair opportunity for assessee. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue to the Assessing Officer to quantify a reasonable disallowance amount under ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal remits Section 14A appeal for quantification. Rule 8D inapplicable per court decision. Fair opportunity for assessee.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the issue to the Assessing Officer to quantify a reasonable disallowance amount under section 14A for the assessment year 2006-07. The Tribunal held that Rule 8D is not applicable for that year based on the Bombay High Court decision in Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. DCIT, overruling the application of Rule 8D as per the ITAT Special Bench decision in Daga Capital. The assessee is to be given a fair opportunity to present their case.
Issues involved: The judgment involves the disallowance of an amount u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 for assessment year 2006-07.
Issue 1 - Disallowance u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act: The Assessing Officer disallowed an amount of Rs. 1,13,158/- u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, pertaining to the investment of Rs. 53,43,675/- in equity shares of listed companies, the income from which is exempt. The Assessing Officer applied Rule 8D based on the ITAT Special Bench decision in Daga Capital.
Issue 2 - Confirmation by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals): Upon the assessee's appeal, the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the Assessing Officer's disallowance.
Judgment Details: The Tribunal considered the case in light of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court's decision in Godrej Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. vs. DCIT, where it was held that Rule 8D is applicable only from Assessment year 2008-09. The High Court overruled the tribunal decision in M/s Daga Capital Management P. Ltd. Accordingly, the Tribunal remitted the issue to the Assessing Officer to quantify a reasonable amount for the assessment year 2006-07, as Rule 8D shall not be applicable. The assessee is to be given an adequate opportunity to be heard. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.
The judgment was pronounced in the open court on 23/12/2010.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
