Appellate Tribunal rules duty demand mis-conceived for re-packer. Stay granted, no recovery during appeals. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty demand on certain products was mis-conceived as they did not ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellate Tribunal rules duty demand mis-conceived for re-packer. Stay granted, no recovery during appeals.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that duty demand on certain products was mis-conceived as they did not attract duty in the hands of the appellant, who was a re-packer. Stay applications were allowed, and there would be no recovery during the appeals.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant regarding duty demand on Saunf Ka Ark, Sandalwood Oil, and Clove Oil classified under Heading 33.01. The tribunal found that the duty demand was mis-conceived as the items did not attract duty in the hands of the appellant who was only a re-packer. Stay applications were allowed, and there would be no recovery during the appeals.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.