Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the pending service tax appeal, the appellant should be directed to make a pre-deposit and whether waiver of the remaining demand should be granted during pendency of the appeal.
Analysis: The demand arose from inclusion of the value of goods/materials supplied by the contractee in the taxable value of works contract service. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue had succeeded in an earlier Tribunal decision on the same issue and that the matter was stated to be pending before the High Court. The adjudicating authority had also examined the relevant exemption/valuation notifications governing inclusion of material value. In these circumstances, the Tribunal found that the balance of convenience lay with the Revenue and that no material had been shown to establish undue or financial hardship justifying complete waiver.
Conclusion: The appellant was required to deposit Rs. 2 crores within eight weeks, and the remaining demand was waived during the pendency of the appeal subject to compliance with the pre-deposit direction.