Valuation of clearances to sister units required fresh adjudication where the existing record lacked clear findings.

Valuation of goods cleared to sister units or own units depended on whether Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 applied or whether transaction value could be adopted. Because the record showed sales of the same goods to independent buyers and a statement indicating clearance to related units on the basis of independent buyers' transaction value, but the adjudication order did not resolve the factual and legal controversy or consider the earlier supporting decision, the matter could not be finally decided on the existing record. It was remanded for fresh adjudication after examining the facts, law, and the earlier decision in the appellant's own case.

---

---

Issues: Whether the valuation of goods cleared to sister units/own units was to be determined under Rule 8 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 or on transaction value, and whether the impugned order required remand for want of proper findings.

Analysis: The dispute concerned valuation of Polyester Oriented Yarn, Polyester chips and Fully Drawn Yarn cleared to related units. The record indicated that the appellant also sold the same goods to independent buyers, and the statement of the authorised signatory referred to clearance to sister units on the transaction value of independent buyers. The larger bench decision supporting transaction value was placed before the adjudicating authority, but the adjudication order did not record a clear finding on the factual and legal controversy. In these circumstances, the matter could not be finally decided on the existing record and required reconsideration by the adjudicating authority after examining the facts, law, and the earlier decision in the appellant's own case.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and the appeals were allowed by way of remand.

---