TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether transmission charges, wheeling charges and SLDC charges paid for use of the electricity transmission network were liable for deduction of tax at source under section 194J, or alternatively section 194C, of the Income-tax Act, 1961. (ii) Whether interest under section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where no tax was deductible on such payments.
Issue (i): Whether transmission charges, wheeling charges and SLDC charges paid for use of the electricity transmission network were liable for deduction of tax at source under section 194J, or alternatively section 194C, of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The payments were examined in the light of the nature of services rendered under the electricity transmission arrangement and the earlier decisions of the Tribunal on identical charges. It was held that the charges were paid for transmission and related electricity network services and did not amount to payments for technical services attracting section 194J. The alternative plea under section 194C was also rejected on the basis of the same line of reasoning already accepted in earlier Tribunal decisions.
Conclusion: The payments were not liable to deduction of tax at source under section 194J or section 194C, and the view taken by the first appellate authority was upheld in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether interest under section 201(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where no tax was deductible on such payments.
Analysis: The interest liability was treated as purely consequential to the alleged default in deduction of tax. Since the underlying conclusion was that no tax was deductible on the impugned payments, the foundation for charging interest under section 201(1A) did not survive.
Conclusion: No interest under section 201(1A) was leviable, and the assessee succeeded on this issue as well.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals failed in full, and the deletion of the TDS demand and consequential interest was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Payments for transmission, wheeling and SLDC charges, when found not to be for technical services, do not attract deduction of tax at source under section 194J, and consequential interest under section 201(1A) cannot be levied where no TDS default exists.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
