Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transfer of agricultural land took place on 5-9-2002 or on 21-11-2002 for the purpose of capital gains.
Analysis: The controversy turned on whether the agreement to sell and power of attorney executed in connection with the land sale satisfied the conditions of a transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 read with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The majority view held that the documents, the receipt of full consideration, the reference in the agreement to sell, and the terms of the power of attorney showed that the transaction was complete on 5-9-2002, and that registration later did not postpone the date of transfer. The dissenting view treated the date of registration and delivery of possession as decisive and found the transfer to be on 21-11-2002.
Conclusion: The transfer was held to have taken place on 5-9-2002, and the resulting gain was assessable as short-term capital gain. The appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For capital gains purposes, where an agreement to sell and power of attorney executed on a given date satisfy the requirements of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and effectively allow possession and enjoyment of the immovable property, the transfer is deemed to occur on the date of execution and not on the later date of registration.