Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to the concessional benefit under Notification No. P.4 (8) Finance/Group-4/91-110 dated 6/3/1991 in respect of copper purchased for manufacturing electric wires and cables, and whether any question of law arose from the findings recorded by the Tax Board.
Analysis: The Notification was read as extending the lower rate to purchase of copper used in manufacturing products made of copper. The assessee had used the purchased copper in manufacturing electric wires and cables, and the assessing authority failed to establish that the copper was not so used. The findings recorded by the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tax Board were therefore consistent with the Notification and were factual findings based on the material on record. In such circumstances, no substantial question of law arose from the order of the Tax Board.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the benefit of the Notification, and the revision petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the factual finding is that the purchased goods were used in manufacturing the notified product, and the revenue fails to disprove such use, no question of law arises and the concessional notification benefit cannot be denied.