Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was vitiated for travelling beyond the show-cause notice and for failure to deal with the assessee's objections, thereby violating natural justice.
Analysis: The assessment introduced a formula for proportionate input tax credit refund on zero-rated sales, but that basis had not been disclosed in the show-cause notice. The assessee was therefore not put to notice of the method by which the liability was proposed to be computed. The order also did not deal with the objections on the amended input tax credit provision in any meaningful manner and did not assign reasons on the applicability of the provision to the assessee's manufacturing activity. An assessment order that proceeds on an undisclosed basis and does not consider the objections with reasons suffers from serious procedural infirmity.
Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable and was quashed for violation of natural justice, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration after affording personal hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment cannot rest on a basis not disclosed in the show-cause notice, and the assessing authority must consider the assessee's objections with reasons before finalising liability.