Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy of tax at 14.5% and penalty under section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 was sustainable when the turnover was below the statutory threshold under section 3 of the Act.
Analysis: Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 fixes the liability to pay tax with reference to the prescribed turnover threshold. The impugned proceedings themselves recorded that the turnover was below Rs. 10 lakhs. In that factual setting, the levy of tax at 14.5% and the consequential penalty could not be supported under section 3. The further contention that tax had been collected but not remitted was not reflected in the impugned orders and could not sustain the demand as framed.
Conclusion: The levy of tax and penalty was unsustainable and the writ petitions were allowed in favour of the assessee.