Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing undisclosed income for block assessment, the assessee was entitled to set off loss and unabsorbed depreciation against the total income, and whether the Assessing Officer was right in rejecting that claim.
Analysis: The computation of undisclosed income under the block assessment provisions does not exclude the ordinary rules of computation under the Act. The relevant scheme permits aggregation of income and loss of the previous years falling within the block period, while brought forward losses of earlier years and unabsorbed depreciation are excluded only to the extent indicated by the statutory framework. A prior Supreme Court ruling on the same computation method was applied, and it was held that inter se set off of losses and depreciation accruing in different years within the block period is not prohibited. However, the quantification of the admissible set off had to be verified on the material available before the Assessing Officer.
Conclusion: The rejection of the assessee's claim on principle was incorrect. The assessee was held entitled to set off loss and unabsorbed depreciation, and the matter was remitted only for quantification.
Ratio Decidendi: In block assessment, undisclosed income is computed in accordance with the Act so that inter se set off of losses and unabsorbed depreciation within the block period is permissible, subject to proper quantification on the record.