Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on packing materials and antistatic oil used in the manufacture of texturised yarn when duty was being assessed on the basis of tariff value fixed by notification.
Analysis: For excise duty assessed under the valuation scheme, the assessable value is determined in accordance with the statutory provisions governing valuation and the relevant rules. A tariff value fixed by the Central Government substitutes the assessable value in a ready-made form. On that basis, there was no legal presumption that the value of packing materials stood excluded from the tariff value so as to justify denial of credit on such items.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the packing materials and antistatic oil was held admissible, and the Department's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The denial of credit was not sustainable because fixation of tariff value did not justify a presumption excluding packing-material value from the duty base.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty is assessed on a tariff value fixed by the Central Government, credit cannot be denied on the assumption that packing-material value is automatically excluded from that tariff value unless the statute or notification so provides.