Courier operations at Trivandrum airport kept open for future resumption pending restoration of cargo handling facilities.

Courier operations at Trivandrum International Airport were affected by a stalemate between the custodian and the handling agent, and the Court did not finally adjudicate their rival rights or handling charges. It recorded that the earlier permission in the connected matter had already been acted upon, left the petitioner to seek separate permission for operations at other airports, and directed that any such request be considered independently in accordance with law. It also noted that courier operations at Trivandrum could resume once cargo handling facilities were restored by the Airport Authority of India, thereby preserving the petitioner's position for future operation without granting an immediate substantive mandamus.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to directions enabling continuation or resumption of courier operations at Trivandrum International Airport pending resolution of the dispute between the custodian and the handling agent, and whether any fresh application for operations at other airports was to be considered.

Analysis: The existing stalemate at the airport arose from disputes between the custodian and the handling agent, and the earlier permission granted to courier operators had already been acted upon in the connected matter. The petition was not decided by a substantive adjudication of rival rights to custody or handling charges. Instead, the petitioner was left to seek separate permission for operations at other airports, with such application to be considered independently in accordance with law. The Court also recorded that courier operations at Trivandrum could continue once airport cargo handling facilities resumed under the Airport Authority of India.

Conclusion: The petitioner was not granted an immediate, substantive mandamus removing the operational stalemate, but was left with liberty to pursue separate applications, and future operation at Trivandrum was kept open upon resumption of cargo handling facilities.

Final Conclusion: The matter ended with observations preserving the petitioner's position for future operation and for independent consideration of any separate request, rather than with a full adjudication on the competing airport management dispute.

---