TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payments/contributions made by the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti to the Rajasthan State Agriculture Marketing Board, made under the statutory scheme governing market committees and the Board, amounted to an application of income so as to exclude the amount from TDS consequences and the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia).
Analysis: The statutory framework under the Rajasthan Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1961 showed that the market committee and the Board were created for carrying out the purposes of the Act, the marketing development fund was to be used for specified statutory purposes, and the amounts contributed by the Samiti were not refundable but were earmarked for those purposes. Following the earlier binding view that such contributions constituted application of income, the Tribunal held that the payments were to be tested on commercial principles and not as ordinary assessable income subjected to artificial computation under the Income-tax Act. On that basis, the Tribunal also held that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on such payments and that section 40(a)(ia) could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee: the contributions to the Marketing Board were treated as application of income and section 40(a)(ia) was held inapplicable.
TaxTMI 
