Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand raised for the assessment year was liable to be kept in abeyance and reconsidered after giving effect to the sanctioned scheme dated 14.01.2003 and the clarificatory order dated 07.08.2006.
Analysis: The demand was stated to have been raised without first giving effect to the mandate of the sanctioned scheme. The Revenue did not dispute that the concessions under the scheme had to be considered before any demand was worked out. In view of the agreed position, the respondents were required to consider the concessions under the scheme and a fresh demand, if any, could be raised thereafter.
Outcome: The impugned demand was directed to remain in abeyance and the respondents were directed to consider the scheme before proceeding further.