Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner's order restricting waiver of penalty and interest to 50 per cent under section 273A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 18B of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 was sustainable in the absence of recorded reasons.
Analysis: The assessee had filed the returns before the issuance of notices under sections 139(2) and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the corresponding notices under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and the assessments were completed on the basis of those voluntary returns. The Commissioner accepted the statutory conditions for relief but granted only partial reduction without recording any reason for limiting the waiver to 50 per cent. In the absence of reasons, the order could not stand, and the matter required reconsideration on merits.
Conclusion: The restriction of relief to 50 per cent was unsustainable; the impugned order was quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where discretionary relief under the taxing statutes is granted only in part, the authority must record reasons for limiting the relief; an unreasoned partial grant is liable to be set aside and reconsidered.