Voluntary retirement scheme deductions under tax law were tested against section 10(10C), section 89 and Rule 2BA.

Voluntary retirement scheme deductions were examined against section 10(10C), section 89 and Rule 2BA. The text notes that relief under section 10(10C) was understood to be capped at Rs. 5 lakhs, with section 89 potentially extending tax benefit beyond that limit, while Rule 2BA remained relevant because a compliant scheme should not fill vacancies created by voluntary retirement. On the facts recorded, the scheme clause expressly permitted the bank to fill such vacancies, so no substantive relief was granted in the petition and the petitioners were left to pursue any independent remedy available in law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petition challenging deductions from amounts received under the voluntary retirement scheme warranted adjudication on the alleged contravention of the income-tax provisions and the scheme condition regarding filling up of vacancies.

Analysis: The order noted the prior view that relief under section 10(10C) was restricted to Rs. 5 lakhs and that section 89 could extend the benefit for amounts beyond that limit. It also recorded that compliance with Rule 2BA was relevant, since the scheme contemplated that vacancies caused by voluntary retirement were not to be filled up. On the facts, the scheme clause expressly permitted the Bank to fill up vacancies caused by release of officers under the exit option, and the order therefore declined to grant substantive relief in the petition, leaving the petitioners to pursue any independent remedy in law against the clause or the rule.

Conclusion: No substantive relief was granted in the petition, and the petitioners were left to seek any available independent remedy.

---