Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a dispute concerning valuation of excisable goods cleared partly from the factory gate and partly from a depot, the appellant was entitled to complete waiver of pre-deposit.
Analysis: Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 applies where excisable goods are not sold at the time and place of removal but are transferred to a depot or other place from which they are sold, in which event valuation is to be based on the normal transaction value of comparable goods sold from such other place at or about the same time. Since the goods were cleared both from the factory gate and from the depot, the appellant's contention that depot sales were irrelevant did not establish a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: Complete waiver of pre-deposit was declined, but partial relief was granted by directing deposit of a specified amount and staying recovery of the balance during pendency of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The application for stay was allowed only to a limited extent, with conditional relief against recovery of the remaining demand.
Ratio Decidendi: Where depot clearances are involved, Rule 7 of the Central Excise Valuation (Determination of Price of Excisable Goods) Rules, 2000 may justify valuation on the basis of depot transaction value, and absence of a prima facie case can warrant denial of full waiver of pre-deposit.