Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be set aside for breach of natural justice on account of inadequate opportunity of hearing before passing the order under the trade tax proceedings.
Analysis: The assessment had already been completed, and thereafter proceedings were initiated under Section 21 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act. The notice fixing the matter for hearing was received late in the evening on the previous day, and only a very short time was afforded for appearance. The request for a short adjournment was refused. In these circumstances, the requirement of fairness in decision-making was not satisfied, because at least a short and effective opportunity ought to have been granted before the adverse order was made.
Conclusion: The order dated 31 March 2000 was set aside for violation of principles of natural justice, and the respondents were left at liberty to pass a fresh order after giving the petitioner an opportunity of hearing in accordance with law.