1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Limitation Act doesn't apply to Central Excise proceedings. Precedent set in India House v. Kishan N. Lalwani.</h1> The Supreme Court upheld the High Court decision that the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to proceedings under the Central Excise Act, following the ... Applicability of Limitation Act 1963 - Held that: - the provisions of the Limitation Act, 1963 have no application in relation to proceedings under the Central Excise Act - the Act as a special statute deals with the matter relating to limitation. The High Court cannot be said to have committed any error in following the judgment of this Court in India House v. Kishan N. Lalwani [2002 (12) TMI 621 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA], where it was held that It is well-settled that by virtue of sub-Section (2) of Section 29 of the Limitation Act the provisions of Section 12 are applicable for computing the period of limitation prescribed by any special or local law. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to proceedings under the Central Excise Act. The High Court decision was upheld based on the precedent set in India House v. Kishan N. Lalwani - 2003 (9) SCC 393. The special leave petition was dismissed.