Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could be denied SSI exemption under Notification No. 16/97-CE dated 01.04.1997 on the ground that it had opted for MODVAT scheme when its clearances were below the prescribed limit, and whether the Tribunal's finding that there was no voluntary opt-out or violation of the notification conditions gave rise to any substantial question of law.
Analysis: The assessee had initially availed SSI exemption and later came under the MODVAT scheme, but the Tribunal found that the shift was not voluntary and was occasioned by implementation of an adjudication order in another matter requiring payment of duty at full rate. On that factual foundation, the Tribunal held that the assessee could not be treated as having contravened the conditions of the exemption notification. The High Court found no perversity in that reasoning and no substantial question of law arising for consideration.
Conclusion: The denial of SSI exemption was not sustainable on the facts found by the Tribunal, and the appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's entitlement to the exemption was left undisturbed, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee is compelled by lawful adjudicatory action to pay duty at full rate, such compliance does not amount to a voluntary violation of the conditions of an exemption notification so as to justify denial of the exemption.