Tribunal grants relief on specific expenses, sets aside deduction disallowance decision.

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Specific disallowances were addressed, with relief granted on loss on account of damages, repair of plant & machinery, motor running expenses, and miscellaneous expenses. The Tribunal set aside the decision on disallowance of deduction for further consideration, allowing ground No. 3 for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Appeal filed by the assessee challenging the order of learned CIT(A)-II, Kanpur for assessment year 2004-05.
2. Disallowance of expenses by the Assessing Officer and subsequent appeals by the assessee regarding loss on account of damages, repair of plant & machinery, motor running expenses, and miscellaneous expenses.
3. Disallowance of deduction claimed by the assessee for various sums aggregating to &8377; 1,44,59,497.

Issue 1: Appeal by the assessee
The appeal by the assessee was against the order of the learned CIT(A)-II, Kanpur for the assessment year 2004-05. The first ground of the appeal was related to the deficiency in the notice issued under section 143(2) and the variation between the returned income and the assessed income. However, during the hearing, the assessee's representative submitted that this ground was not pressed. The second ground of the appeal focused on the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer, which included loss on account of damages, repair of plant & machinery, motor running expenses, and miscellaneous expenses. The assessee argued that these disallowances were not justified as the books of account were audited and no adverse remarks were made. The Revenue supported the assessment order, but the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on the second ground, partially allowing the appeal.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Expenses
Regarding the disallowance of expenses by the Assessing Officer, the Tribunal analyzed each specific disallowance separately. The first item was the addition made in respect of loss on account of damages to the factory building/shed due to a hailstorm. The Tribunal noted that the loss was part of the insurance claim made by the assessee in a previous year and allowed the claim as a business loss in the present year. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal on this issue. The Tribunal then addressed the ad hoc disallowances made on repair of plant & machinery, motor running expenses, and miscellaneous expenses. While confirming the disallowance of a portion of expenses related to repair of plant & machinery and motor running expenses due to lack of verifiable evidence, the Tribunal deleted the disallowance related to miscellaneous expenses as they were considered usual office and administrative expenses.

Issue 3: Disallowance of Deduction
The third issue pertained to the disallowance of a deduction claimed by the assessee for various sums aggregating to &8377; 1,44,59,497. The assessee contended that the disallowance was made based on a judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court and argued that the issue should be decided on merit rather than following the judgment. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's argument and set aside the order of the learned CIT(A), restoring the matter back for a fresh decision after providing adequate opportunity for both sides to be heard. Consequently, ground No. 3 was allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal of the Revenue and partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, providing relief on specific disallowances and setting aside the decision on the disallowance of deduction for further consideration.

---