Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was warranted where tax deducted at source was stated to have been deposited before the due date under section 139(1), and whether the amended provision applied retrospectively.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its earlier view that the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) brought by the Finance Act, 2010 was clarificatory and remedial in nature, intended to remove unintended hardship and make the provision workable. It treated the amended requirement, namely that no disallowance arises if tax deducted at source is paid on or before the due date for filing the return, as applicable retrospectively from the date when section 40(a)(ia) was inserted. On that basis, the crucial factual question was whether the assessee had in fact deposited the tax within the due date under section 139(1), and the Tribunal directed verification of the actual dates of payment.
Conclusion: Disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was not to be sustained where the tax deducted at source had been deposited before the due date for filing the return, and the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and fresh decision.