Reopening on a mere change of opinion is invalid where full disclosure was already made by the assessee.

A reopening notice under sections 147 and 148 was held unsustainable where the assessee had made full and complete disclosure of the relevant facts and the Assessing Officer sought to revisit material already on record. The reopening was based on section 41(4A), but the effective date and related facts had already been disclosed in the computation of income. On that basis, the appellate authorities treated the exercise as a mere change of opinion, and the reassessment challenge failed with the appeal dismissed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the notice issued for reopening the assessment under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid when the assessee had made full and complete disclosure of the relevant facts and the reopening was based on a mere change of opinion.

Analysis: The reasons recorded for reopening were found to rest on a reconsideration of material already disclosed by the assessee. The Assessing Officer had relied upon section 41(4A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, but the relevant fact, including the effective date of that provision, had already been brought to notice in the assessee's computation of income. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal therefore held that there had been full disclosure and that the reopening was not sustainable as it amounted to a change of opinion.

Conclusion: The reopening notice was invalid and the challenge to the reassessment failed; the appeal was dismissed.

---