Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a cheque tendered towards advance tax, but returned unpaid on first presentation and later redeposited with a fresh challan, could be treated as payment on the original date of tender for the purposes of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Advance ruling jurisdiction was held to extend to the question because the liability to interest arose directly from the applicant's transaction in India. On the merits, the Court distinguished cases where cheques were honoured on presentation after delay: the relation-back principle and the CBDT circular relied upon by the applicant applied only where the cheque was ultimately honoured in the ordinary course. Here, the cheque was returned unpaid, ceased to be a live instrument, and its later redeposit with a fresh challan amounted in substance to a fresh tender. The rules governing payment of Government dues and the bank's token procedure did not assist the applicant, and the applicable receipt-and-payment rules required clearance and entry in the receipt scroll before payment could be treated as complete.
Conclusion: The payment could be treated as made only on 15-4-1994 at the earliest, so the applicant was liable to interest under sections 234B and 234C.
Ratio Decidendi: A dishonoured cheque does not relate back to the original date of tender for advance-tax purposes, and interest under sections 234B and 234C follows unless the tax is actually paid within the statutory time limit.