Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether on the facts of the case income, profits and gains in respect of sales made to the Government of India were received in British India within the meaning of Section 4(1)(a) of the Act.
Analysis: The contract expressly prescribed payment by cheque and the assessee had requested remittance by cheque on a bank in Bombay. The cheques were drawn by the Government department at Delhi on the Reserve Bank of India, Bombay branch, and were posted and received by the assessee at its office in Aundh. Under Section 50 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, performance in the manner prescribed by the promisee discharges the contract. Where a creditor requests remittance and cheques are sent in the ordinary course by post, the post office becomes the agent of the creditor and posting amounts to delivery; authorities treat a cheque as payment unless dishonoured, and payment relates back to the date of delivery where the condition of honour is satisfied. The Tribunal found the cheques were received by post and were cashed without dishonour; these facts support either an implied unconditional acceptance or, alternatively, a conditional acceptance which was not defeated because the cheques were honoured.
Conclusion: On the facts, the receipts in respect of sales to the Government of India were received in British India within the meaning of Section 4(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.