TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court rules association's entrance fees & subscriptions not taxable but nominees' commission is.</h1> <h3>SURAT DISTRICT COTTON DEALERS' ASSOCIATION Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH, KUTCH AND SAURASHTRA, AHEMADABAD</h3> SURAT DISTRICT COTTON DEALERS' ASSOCIATION Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, BOMBAY NORTH, KUTCH AND SAURASHTRA, AHEMADABAD - [1959] 35 ITR 121 (Bom) Issues:1. Taxability of entrance fee and annual subscription received by the Association.2. Taxability of lagas received by the Association.3. Taxability of receipts on account of nominees' commission.Analysis:Issue 1: Taxability of entrance fee and annual subscriptionThe Tribunal held that the entrance fee and annual subscription received by the Association were not liable to tax. The High Court concurred with this decision, stating that these amounts were not taxable income. The Association's purpose was to develop the local cotton business and assist its members. The funds received through entrance fees and subscriptions were not for commercial profit but for the benefit of the members and the association's objectives.Issue 2: Taxability of lagas received by the AssociationThe High Court found that the lagas received by the Association did not constitute income as they were derived by a mutual association. The principle of mutuality was established as all members had the right to contribute to the fund, even though the liability to pay lagas was only upon the sellers. The court disagreed with the Tribunal's application of section 10(6) of the Income-tax Act, as there was no evidence that the Association provided specific services in return for the lagas received.Issue 3: Taxability of receipts on account of nominees' commissionThe High Court determined that the receipts on account of nominees' commission were taxable income. Unlike the lagas, there was no mutuality between the nominees and the Association. The court rejected the argument that these receipts fell under section 4(3)(vii) as casual and non-recurring income. The receipts were not fortuitous or unforeseen, as they were payments for services rendered by the Association under a known agreement.Additional Consideration:The Commissioner sought to raise a question regarding the taxability of entrance fees and annual subscriptions, which the Tribunal had previously ruled against. However, the High Court found that the Commissioner's application was barred by limitation and could not be entertained as per the provisions of the law. Therefore, the court dismissed the notice of motion and upheld the Tribunal's decision on this matter.In conclusion, the High Court ruled in favor of the Association regarding the taxability of lagas but against them concerning the receipts on account of nominees' commission. The court emphasized that if the Department has the power to exempt the Association from tax on the commission received, it should consider the Association's contributions to a deserving cause, such as the maintenance of the Commerce College at Surat.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
