Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tax Tribunal: Cooperative Society Contributions Deemed Non-Taxable.</h1> <h3>Pathare Prabhu co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Versus ITO-15 (2) (2), Mumbai</h3> Pathare Prabhu co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Versus ITO-15 (2) (2), Mumbai - TMI Issues Involved:1. Taxability of contributions towards special development funds.2. Taxability of land premium on transfer in excess of Rs. 25,000.Detailed Analysis:1. Taxability of Contributions Towards Special Development Funds:The assessee, a registered cooperative Housing Society, was assessed by the ITO Ward-15(2)(2), Mumbai. For the assessment years 2003-04 to 2006-07 and 2008-09, the AO issued notices under section 143(2) of the I.T. Act and treated amounts received from members for issuing NOC for development of plots and use of TDR as income from other sources. The CIT(A) confirmed this action. However, the assessee argued that these contributions were towards a special development fund, utilized for the benefit of society members, thus satisfying the principle of mutuality and not liable to tax.The ITAT found that the amount received was used for purposes such as constructing a cultural center, beautification, healthcare, gym facilities, education loans, purchasing land, promoting sports, and ensuring security for members. These purposes were decided in a special general meeting on 17-12-2006. The principle of mutuality was satisfied as the contributions were used for the members' benefits, with no profit motive. The ITAT relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in the case of Jai Hind CHS Ltd., which held that payments made by members for additional FSI utilization were not taxable due to mutuality between the society and its members. Consequently, the ITAT directed the AO to delete the additions made for these contributions in all the years under consideration.2. Taxability of Land Premium on Transfer in Excess of Rs. 25,000:For the assessment years 2003-04 and 2005-06, the AO taxed the land premium on transfer received by the society in excess of Rs. 25,000. The assessee placed reliance on the Tribunal's decision in the case of The Friends Co-op Housing Society Ltd., where similar issues were decided in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal in that case followed the judgment of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court in Sind Cooperative Housing Society, which applied the principle of mutuality to cooperative housing societies. The Tribunal noted that the activities of the society were non-commercial and aimed at maintaining the property and providing amenities to members, satisfying the mutuality principle.The ITAT also referred to the Bombay High Court's decision in Mittal Court Premises Co-operative Society Ltd., which held that contributions such as transfer fees and non-occupancy charges were not taxable if they adhered to the principle of mutuality. The Court emphasized that as long as contributions were used for society's objectives and there was no profit motive, the principle of mutuality applied.Following these precedents, the ITAT concluded that the land premium on transfer received by the society from its members was not taxable. The ITAT noted that the AO's non-acceptance of the Bombay High Court's decision in Sind Cooperative Housing Society was not justified, as the revenue's appeal to the Supreme Court did not negate the binding nature of the High Court's ruling.Conclusion:The ITAT allowed all the appeals of the assessee, holding that both the contributions towards special development funds and the land premium on transfer were not taxable due to the principle of mutuality. The AO was directed to delete the additions made in all the years under consideration. The order was pronounced in the open court on 09/10/2015.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found