TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Waives Deposit, Halts Recovery: Appellant's Case Strong</h1> <h3>MCI LEASING (P) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MYSORE</h3> The Tribunal granted waiver of the deposit of the demanded amount and stayed the recovery proceedings, considering the appellant's strong case on merits ... - Issues involved: Appeal against Order-in-Revision u/s 2/ST/07 dated 27-3-2007 passed by CCE, C & ST Mysore regarding refund erroneously sanctioned to the appellant.Summary:Issue 1: Refund erroneously sanctionedThe appellant filed a refund claim for the amount paid during a specific period, which was erroneously paid under a mistaken notion of law. The Original Authority sanctioned the entire refund, but the Commissioner of Customs ordered recovery of a part of the amount on grounds of time-bar. The appellant's counsel cited various decisions supporting the refund of amounts collected by the department not authorized by law. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and legal precedents, found justification for waiver of deposit of the demanded amount and stayed the recovery proceedings pending appeal.Significant Legal References:- Mafatlal Industries - 1997 (89) E.L.T. 241- National Tobacco Corporation of India - 1978 (2) E.L.T. J416 (S.C.)- Hexacom (I) Ltd. v. CCE - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 131 (Tribunal) = 2003 (156) E.L.T. 357 (Tribunal)- CCE v. M.A. Financial Services - 2006 (2) S.T.R. 350 (Tri.-Kol)- Karnik Maritime Pvt Ltd. v. CCE - 2007 (6) S.T.R. 314 (Tri. - Mum)- CCE v. Jai Laxmi Finance Co. - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 25 (Tribunal)- CCE v. Indian Ispat Works (P) Ltd. - 2006 (3) S.T.R. 161 (Tri.-Del)Conclusion:The Tribunal granted waiver of the deposit of the demanded amount and stayed the recovery proceedings, considering the appellant's strong case on merits pending appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
