Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the retrospective insertion of section 7A in the Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974, the matter required remand to the Tribunal for fresh consideration of the includibility of compulsory deposits in the assessee's net wealth under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The retrospective amendment deemed compulsory deposits to be deposits with a banking company for the purpose of exemption under section 5 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The relevant provisions of section 5(1)(xxvi) and section 5(1A) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 had to be applied to the deposits in question, and the Tribunal had decided the appeal without noticing the amendment. Since the amendment materially affected the treatment of the deposits and the underlying contentions had not been examined by the Tribunal, a fresh determination was necessary.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the Tribunal for rehearing and disposal in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A retrospective statutory amendment affecting the tax treatment of an asset must be applied by the appellate authority, and where the authority has decided the matter without considering such amendment, remand for fresh adjudication is warranted.