Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended valuation provisions in Schedule III of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 applied to a pending assessment and whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's direction to adopt that schedule.
Analysis: The valuation provisions in Schedule III were treated as procedural in character and akin to rules of evidence. Procedural law applies to pending matters, and market value is to be determined according to the law in force when the assessment is made. The issue was concluded by the Supreme Court decision holding that the relevant valuation rule is procedural and applicable to pending proceedings. Once that position was settled, no independent referable question survived for consideration.
Conclusion: The amended Schedule III valuation provisions applied to the pending matter, and the Tribunal was justified in refusing to refer the question of law.